The Trunk

  • Click Here For My Writing Tumblr
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything
(via The Apple Boycott Graphically Explained - Forbes)
I mostly agree, but the argument is more complicated than this.
Pop-upView Separately

(via The Apple Boycott Graphically Explained - Forbes)

I mostly agree, but the argument is more complicated than this.

Source: forbes.com

  • 57 minutes ago
  • 28
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Judy Sanchez woke Thursday to the sound of heavy footsteps in her stairwell, followed by a loud motor. She got to her kitchen in time to see the blade of a chain saw rip through her front door. “It was so crazy,” Judy Sanchez said. “I was terrified.

Fitchburg woman and daughter ‘terrified’ as saw rips down door after getting wrong address in drug sweep - Sentinel & Enterprise

Nothing wrong with the drug war, aside from the fact that it turns our officers into the villains in a horror film.

Source: sentinelandenterprise.com

  • 23 hours ago
  • 5
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
As to my freedom, which you say I can have, there is nothing to be gained on that score, as I got my free papers in 1864 from the Provost-Marshal-General of the Department of Nashville. Mandy says she would be afraid to go back without some proof that you were disposed to treat us justly and kindly; and we have concluded to test your sincerity by asking you to send us our wages for the time we served you. This will make us forget and forgive old scores, and rely on your justice and friendship in the future. I served you faithfully for thirty-two years, and Mandy twenty years. At twenty-five dollars a month for me, and two dollars a week for Mandy, our earnings would amount to eleven thousand six hundred and eighty dollars. Add to this the interest for the time our wages have been kept back, and deduct what you paid for our clothing, and three doctor’s visits to me, and pulling a tooth for Mandy, and the balance will show what we are in justice entitled to. Please send the money by Adams’s Express, in care of V. Winters, Esq., Dayton, Ohio. If you fail to pay us for faithful labors in the past, we can have little faith in your promises in the future. We trust the good Maker has opened your eyes to the wrongs which you and your fathers have done to me and my fathers, in making us toil for you for generations without recompense. Here I draw my wages every Saturday night; but in Tennessee there was never any pay-day for the negroes any more than for the horses and cows. Surely there will be a day of reckoning for those who defraud the laborer of his hire.

Jourdon Anderson, Letters of Note: To My Old Master

Amazing letter from a former slave to his old master.  Read the whole thing.

Source: lettersofnote.com

  • 1 day ago
  • 15
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
The rhetoric of class and inequality is back in force, and Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren — the standard-bearer for a combative new progressivism — made the case to MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell last night that members of the Senate shouldn’t own stock. “I realize there are some wealthy individuals – I’m not one of them, but some wealthy individuals who have a lot of stock portfolios” she told him.
Hard to see how Warren wouldn’t be, by most standards, wealthy, according to the Personal Financial Disclosure form she filed to run for Senate shows that she’s worth as much as $14.5 million. She earned more than $429,000 from Harvard last year alone for a total of about $700,000, and lives in a house worth $5 million.

Elizabeth Warren Says She’s Not In The 1%

Shame on BuzzFeed for the misleading headline—Warren denied owning stock portfolios, not that she was in the 1%.  But shame on Warren for trying to clarify the mess above by stating that she owned only “mutual funds” and not a “broad portfolio of stocks,” when mutual funds are a broad portfolio of stocks.

Source: BuzzFeed

  • 5 days ago
  • 27
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
The other day, I called Cassandra Gero, a fashion historian at the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute, to chat about pajamas. She sent me an article that ran in the New York Times in 1929 under the headline “Court Sanctions Pajamas in Street.” The paper reported that a New Jersey barber named Samuel Nelson had made a bet that he could walk from Newark to Irvington in pajamas without being arrested. He was wrong; a policeman picked him up and put him in the slammer. But justice ultimately prevailed. A wise judge freed Nelson, calling his arrest “both asinine and stupid,” and warning the policeman, “Neither you nor I are censors of modern fashion here.” If only we lived in such enlightened times.
Pajamas in public: The popularity of sleepwear is not a sign of America’s declining moral fiber. - Slate Magazine

Source: Slate

  • 6 days ago
  • 5
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
A little peacenik love, from Newt’s novel, Valley Forge
Pop-upView Separately

A little peacenik love, from Newt’s novel, Valley Forge

  • 6 days ago
  • 2
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
apoplecticskeptic:

jeffmiller:

Earlier, I noted that Mr. Buffett’s secretary only makes $60,000 a year—not a bad living, but pretty meager when compared to her boss’ $50 billion net worth.  As the chart above shows, the average CEO secretary makes more than this; indeed, $60,000 would place Buffett’s secretary around the 25th percentile.  And I think we all know that Buffett is not the average CEO—he’s the richest CEO in the United States.  
Isn’t there something fundamentally weird about a man who is willing to use his secretary’s economic situation to make a political point without any embarrassment whatsoever about his responsibility for her income?  Again, she’s been his secretary for two decades; she’s been at the company for 38 years.  Instead of crusading for his own taxes to be higher, maybe Buffett could try to pay his employees a little bit more.  
Someone should start a petition.

The irony of a Libertarian stating that anyone other than the individual is ultimately responsible for their own income is too rich too pass up. Seriously? She’s a secretary in Omaha who clearly likes her gig enough to remain there for nearly 4 decades. He must be doing something right by his employees. She can walk anytime she wants. Hell, if she played her cards right she could walk into any other high-profile CEO’s office and ask for 5x that salary, probably.
Should the pay for a given position be based on, or evaluated in light of, the personal wealth of the person doing the hiring (or even the overall financial health of the company itself)? Or should it be based chiefly on the task for which the employee is being hired and the comparative wages in the workplace for similar positions while being considered alongside the relative value the company places on the tasks it needs performed?

Perhaps my tongue was not planted clearly enough in my cheek.  Do I think Buffett has a moral obligation to pay his secretary more?—of course not.  
My point is this:  Buffett wants us to feel bad for his secretary by claiming she pays a higher tax rate than he does.  The math behind his claim is suspect; for example, he’s willing, I suppose, to include the employer portion of her payroll tax, but not the corporate tax paid on his companies’ incomes prior to distribution.  But whatever—he’s making a political argument, and people lie with numbers all the time to make a political argument.  What I find to be troubling, however, is that he drafted his secretary into this battle—asking that everyone feel sympathy for her, even though he has far more power over her economic circumstance that anyone else.  If Buffett really is worried about wealth inequality in this country, perhaps he could lead a little by example before lobbying for coercive redistributive measures.
View Separately

apoplecticskeptic:

jeffmiller:

Earlier, I noted that Mr. Buffett’s secretary only makes $60,000 a year—not a bad living, but pretty meager when compared to her boss’ $50 billion net worth.  As the chart above shows, the average CEO secretary makes more than this; indeed, $60,000 would place Buffett’s secretary around the 25th percentile.  And I think we all know that Buffett is not the average CEO—he’s the richest CEO in the United States.  

Isn’t there something fundamentally weird about a man who is willing to use his secretary’s economic situation to make a political point without any embarrassment whatsoever about his responsibility for her income?  Again, she’s been his secretary for two decades; she’s been at the company for 38 years.  Instead of crusading for his own taxes to be higher, maybe Buffett could try to pay his employees a little bit more.  

Someone should start a petition.

The irony of a Libertarian stating that anyone other than the individual is ultimately responsible for their own income is too rich too pass up. Seriously? She’s a secretary in Omaha who clearly likes her gig enough to remain there for nearly 4 decades. He must be doing something right by his employees. She can walk anytime she wants. Hell, if she played her cards right she could walk into any other high-profile CEO’s office and ask for 5x that salary, probably.

Should the pay for a given position be based on, or evaluated in light of, the personal wealth of the person doing the hiring (or even the overall financial health of the company itself)? Or should it be based chiefly on the task for which the employee is being hired and the comparative wages in the workplace for similar positions while being considered alongside the relative value the company places on the tasks it needs performed?

Perhaps my tongue was not planted clearly enough in my cheek.  Do I think Buffett has a moral obligation to pay his secretary more?—of course not.  

My point is this:  Buffett wants us to feel bad for his secretary by claiming she pays a higher tax rate than he does.  The math behind his claim is suspect; for example, he’s willing, I suppose, to include the employer portion of her payroll tax, but not the corporate tax paid on his companies’ incomes prior to distribution.  But whatever—he’s making a political argument, and people lie with numbers all the time to make a political argument.  What I find to be troubling, however, is that he drafted his secretary into this battle—asking that everyone feel sympathy for her, even though he has far more power over her economic circumstance that anyone else.  If Buffett really is worried about wealth inequality in this country, perhaps he could lead a little by example before lobbying for coercive redistributive measures.

Source: jeffmiller

  • 6 days ago > jeffmiller
  • 47
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Earlier, I noted that Mr. Buffett’s secretary only makes $60,000 a year—not a bad living, but pretty meager when compared to her boss’ $50 billion net worth.  As the chart above shows, the average CEO secretary makes more than this; indeed, $60,000 would place Buffett’s secretary around the 25th percentile.  And I think we all know that Buffett is not the average CEO—he’s the richest CEO in the United States.  
Isn’t there something fundamentally weird about a man who is willing to use his secretary’s economic situation to make a political point without any embarrassment whatsoever about his responsibility for her income?  Again, she’s been his secretary for two decades; she’s been at the company for 38 years.  Instead of crusading for his own taxes to be higher, maybe Buffett could try to pay his employees a little bit more.  
Someone should start a petition.
View Separately

Earlier, I noted that Mr. Buffett’s secretary only makes $60,000 a year—not a bad living, but pretty meager when compared to her boss’ $50 billion net worth.  As the chart above shows, the average CEO secretary makes more than this; indeed, $60,000 would place Buffett’s secretary around the 25th percentile.  And I think we all know that Buffett is not the average CEO—he’s the richest CEO in the United States.  

Isn’t there something fundamentally weird about a man who is willing to use his secretary’s economic situation to make a political point without any embarrassment whatsoever about his responsibility for her income?  Again, she’s been his secretary for two decades; she’s been at the company for 38 years.  Instead of crusading for his own taxes to be higher, maybe Buffett could try to pay his employees a little bit more.  

Someone should start a petition.

  • 6 days ago
  • 47
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Mr. Buffett also wrote that his secretary, who makes $60,000 a year, pays over 30 percent of her income in taxes. The Internal Revenue Service reports the average tax rate for someone making that amount is 11.6 percent. Even adding on payroll taxes, she isn’t paying anywhere near 30 percent.

MILLER: Buffett’s rebuff - Washington Times

I can’t vouch for the analysis above.  But isn’t it a little strange that progressives are up in arms about how this woman’s tax rate compares to Warren Buffett’s, yet none of them are calling for the world’s third richest man to pay his secretary more than $60,000 a year?  The man has $50 billion, but he only pays the woman who manages his office $60,000?  She’s worked for his company for 37 years!!!!!!!  She’s been his personal secretary for two decades!!!!!!!  And now Buffett’s trotting her out to make a political point … don’t you think the woman deserves more?

Source: washingtontimes.com

  • 6 days ago
  • 11
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

Can the Government Make Entrepreneurs Do Useless Things For No Reason? (by InstituteForJustice)

Source: youtube.com

  • 6 days ago
  • 4
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
He found that even fathers in jail who had abandoned their kids were still better than no father at all to have in their children’s lives,” Santorum told voters earlier this month, according to the Los Angeles Times. If a same-sex couple were to raise a child, he said they would be “robbing children of something they need, they deserve, they have a right to. You may rationalize that that isn’t true, but in your own life and in your own heart, you know it’s true.

Florida Mom Confronts Santorum Over Gay Son’s Rights | News | The Advocate

Santorum thinks it better to have a father in jail than two mothers.  And somehow he is considered a serious candidate, while Gary Johnson couldn’t get into the debates.

Source: advocate.com

  • 6 days ago
  • 7
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
Drudge is on a mission to destroy Newt.  I approve.
Pop-upView Separately

Drudge is on a mission to destroy Newt.  I approve.

  • 6 days ago
  • 9
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
After and before pictures for the man who was placed in solitary confinement after a DUI  and held without a trial for two years.  In America.
View Separately

After and before pictures for the man who was placed in solitary confinement after a DUI  and held without a trial for two years.  In America.

  • 1 week ago
  • 9
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

A man who spent two years in solitary confinement after getting arrested for DWI was awarded $22 million for suffering inhumane treatment in New Mexico’s Dona Ana County Jail.

Stephen Slevin was arrested in August of 2005 for driving while intoxicated, according to NBC station KOB.com. He said he never got a trial and spent the entire time languishing in solitary, even pulling his own tooth when he was denied dental care.

Man Held in Solitary Confinement 2 Years After DWI Gets $22M | NBC4 Washington

Source: nbcwashington.com

  • 1 week ago
  • 7
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
(via ilovecharts)
Some rebloggers have doubted that gas prices were so low at the time of Obama’s inauguration.  Confirmation can be found here or here or here.
Pop-upView Separately

(via ilovecharts)

Some rebloggers have doubted that gas prices were so low at the time of Obama’s inauguration.  Confirmation can be found here or here or here.

Source: thesourcedaily.com

  • 1 week ago > ilovecharts
  • 848
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet
← Newer • Older →
Page 1 of 243

The Trunk

About

Avatar The Trunk is a place where I keep things. Like the rantings of a semi-reasonable libertarian. Plus, anything else I find interesting.

Me, Elsewhere

  • @jmillerwrites on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • Google

Twitter

loading tweets…

Following

I Dig These Posts

See more →
  • Link via barticles
    Obama's Enemies List

    What [the] Koch [brothers] do, in fact, is manage businesses that provide employment to more than 50,000 people in North...

    Link via barticles
  • Quote via huskerred
    “Romney’s is a benevolent patrician’s view of society: The poor are incorrigible, but let’s add a couple more groats to their food stamps and housing...”
    Quote via huskerred
  • Photo via thedailywhat

    Breaking News of the Day: No surprises in the Sunshine State: Mitt Romney picked up Florida’s 50 delegates with ease, handily defeating rival...

    Photo via thedailywhat
  • Video via shortformblog
    Video

    Gingrich robocall says Romney forced Holocaust survivors to eat non-kosher

    A heavy slur, sloppily made: The Gingrich campaign has, in an...

    Video via shortformblog
  • Link via lost-and-searching-in-america
    Gary Johnson Braves the ACLU - The Libertarian presidential candidate charms a gathering of civil libertarians.
    Link via lost-and-searching-in-america
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr

The Trunk followers